NeoArch

July 27, 2006

Why WordPress Rocks!

Filed under: Blogs and Blogging, wordpress — Jason @ 5:07 pm

WordPress rocks because they gave me a pencil.  Just look at my new header.

Here while back, I used WordPress’s feedback feature to request custom headers for this theme (Think of my blog as a ‘67 Chevelle.) I thought, what self respecting archivist would have a pen rathen than a pencil at the top of his blog. Well, today, Andy from WordPress told me that they had adjusted my theme. He even provided me with a sample picture of a pencil to get me up and running.

Thank you Andy, and thank you WordPress. Hooray, WordPress!

July 26, 2006

Ex Libris Changing Hands

Filed under: Ex Libris, Library Science, Systems, Technology — Jason @ 10:13 am

For those who have not seen the news, Ex Libris is changing hands. Francisco Partners is purchasing EL. Francisco Partners also owns these companies. I am not sure what, if anything, this will mean for the future of the company. It appears that EL is the only library services vendor that Francisco partners owns.

Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts Book Review

Filed under: Archival Certification, Arrangement, Book Reviews, Description — Jason @ 8:00 am
  • Roe, Kathleen D . Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts, Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2005.

Kathleen Roe’s Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts is part of the Society of American Archivists’ Archival Fundamentals Series II. It replaces Frederic Miller’s book of the same title. Both are extremely valuable books, and in my opinion, they complement one another. Miller’s book reads more like a manual. It is very thorough, and I have reviewed it already. Roe’s contribution is an easier read and seems in many places to be carefully, thoughtfully worded. Take, for example, her description of the task of arrangement. “To accomplish [description], the archivist must first arrange records, that is, identify the intellectual pattern existing in the materials, then make sure their physical organization reflects that pattern” (7-8, emphasis mine). I wish someone had described it to me that way when I first began working in archives. That description is nearly perfect and exceptionally graceful. In short, Roe’s work reads more like an introduction to arrangement and description than Miller’s work.

The book begins with an overview of what archives and description (A&D) is and how it relates to other tasks the archivist undertakes like appraisal, preservation, and reference. It then has a chapter on the core concepts for A&D, a chapter that summarizes how A&D practices have developed over time, and a chapter on the practice of A&D The latter chapter makes up the bulk of the book. In the core concepts chapter, Roe does a good job of distinguishing archives from related institutions like libraries and museums. Likewise, she emphasizes strongly that description should begin at the highest level.

Chapter three is essentially a historical overview of A&D practice, especially in the U. S. and Canada. She briefly details the development of standards like MARC, APPM, EAD, DACS, RAD, and ISAD(G). The final chapter examines A&D practice. Although it does not read as manual-like as Miller’s work, Roe provides a solid foundation for thinking through the entire process of A&D, from accessioning to developing finding aids.

The one subject that I wish Roe would have treated more thoroughly is how to implement standardization within one’s collections. I suppose that thorough discussions of implementing EAD and DACS are more appropriate for extended works rather than introductions, but I was hoping for more from this book in that area.

While reading this work, I often found myself thinking, “she just answered a question I have been thinking about for some time.” This entire work contains excellent and well-placed insets with pertinent examples to the subject being discussed. Additionally, Roe offers several appendices that give extended examples and case studies. The case studies prove especially helpful in providing practical advice for dealing with rather difficult arrangement decisions. All in all, I would recommend this book highly, especially to novice archivists.

July 25, 2006

Catharsis

Filed under: Archival Certification, Archives, Uncategorized — Jason @ 7:48 pm

One week from tomorrow I will be taking the ACA exam. I am extremely nervous. I can honestly say that I have studied for this test harder than any other that I have ever taken. They only offer it once a year so I decided to forgo a mission trip with my church to St. Thomas in order to try to take the test. I really wanted to go, but I feel like I have to take the test.

I am fearful right now. I really would like to pass the exam, but I realize that I am essentially a self-trained archivist. I have been to some workshops on archives, and I worked under an archivist who was trained primarily as a historian, but I have no formal training in the field. I have a good bit of on the job training. I have read widely about the field, and I continue to do so, but I am not certain that this will be enough.

I realize that there are constant discussions concerning professionalism and the value of certification in the field. Certification, in my mind, does not necessarily qualify me to be an archivist. The process of preparing for this exam has indeed helped better equip me in the field, but that does not mean that it qualifies me. Likewise, I do not believe that being certified would make me a better archivist. To pass the test would be a point of pride for me. It is a goal for which I have worked very hard. It would say that I at least have attained a fairly decent working knowledge of the field. It would tangibly signify that I understand many of the things that my employer expects me to understand.

Why am I writing this? Perhaps because this blog came about through my desire to prepare for the exam. So, perhaps it’s appropriate that my fear and loathing be expressed here, right beside my book reviews, study notes, and thoughts on archivy.

Diigo Criticism

Filed under: diigo — Jason @ 8:52 am

Diigo Launches, Nobody Cares - Mashable*

Diigo is being criticized over on Mashable for being just one more social bookmarking site. That’s all well and good. I guess when you create a new social tool you should expect that–unless, of course, you create a good one. And that, my friends, is what Diigo is.

So in answer to the who cares question, I offer the following:

  1. Who cares? Bloggers. Trust me. I am one. On several blogs. A large part of blogging is just countering other bloggers. It’s sorta like what I am doing now. Who am I kidding? It is what I am doing now. The advantage to bloggers is twofold. First, Diigo allows you to store your notes right on the page of the blog with which you disagree. Second, Diigo has blog functionality that lets you blog right from Diigo. Which is what I am doing now. Tagging and blogging can occur seamlessly. And it allows you to have multiple blogs. Try doing that with the Performancing plugin (which I love.)
  2. Who cares? Researchers. They have wanted a tool like this for years. I don’t know how many times I have wanted to put marginalia on a blog like I do my books. Now I can. Others can as well. I am a librarian in an academic institution. Trust me. Researchers will use this.
  3. Who cares? Anyone who uses the web. This is the type of tool that has a wide appeal, especially for those who do not already use a social bookmarking service. This one IS better than others. This one DOES offer something others don’t. This one DOESN’T just clip text. This one puts your notes right where you want them.

Hey, I realize there is some truth to the Web 2.x hype. Who wants another social site that has a name that sounds like a Star Wars character. Put if you’re going to fault Diigo for anything, fault it for having a stupid name. Don’t fault it for competing in crowded space. It fills a need for many people, just like all the mom and pop Linux distros out there do. It is marketable, as is evidenced by the fact that over 10,000 people signed up for the Diigo Beta test.

By the way, I’m not a Diigo homer. I will post negatives about it later.

July 17, 2006

You should know about Diigo!

Filed under: Technology, diigo, folksonomy — Jason @ 9:09 am

To those of you who read this blog on a regular basis, I want to apologize diigofor posting infrequently lately. I have had a couple other projects that I have been working on, plus my Church had vacation Bible school last week. You don’t get much done during VBS week.

I just wanted to take the time to inform you about a new social bookmarking service. For those of you who already have one, you’re probably groaning, “Not another one!” I know. I know. I have been using Del.icio.us for…well…forever. delicious42px.gifI can’t remember life before Del.icio.us. In fact, I have no intentions on ceasing from using Del.icio.us. (With Diigo and its toolbar, I don’t have to, but more on that in another post.)

For those of you who don’t have a social bookmarking service…well…you need one. Social bookmarking is a way to keep track of all of the websites that you visit. It allows you to describe the page using several one word “tags.” For example, if you visited the page for “Talladega Nights,” you might tag it as “movie,” “Will_Ferrell,” “stupid,” and “NASCAR.” This may seem like a useless service until you cannot find that page with the thing that you needed for your job and now you’re gonna get fired cause you can’t produce what you said you could. Or perhaps you can’t find that online add for that ring for your wife that you saw that would save you $1000 so now you can’t get a new johnboat because you don’t have the extra $$$$ you would have saved. Trust me. You need one. There are several out there.

Diigo is different, though. The service is only in beta testing at this point, so you have to actually request an invitation to participate. Diigo not only lets you save a bookmark to the page, but it also allows you to highlight content. It lets you add virtual sticky notes to the page. This really is the ideal tool for research and blogs. You can access your thoughts about a certain web page from anywhere in the world, right on the web page. How many times have you wished that blogs and webpages worked like books. You wish that you could add marginalia. You wish that the marginalia could be either public or private. It’s all possible with Diigo.

maverickc&tDon’t just take my word for it. Go try out Diigo’s playground for yourself. If you don’t think the service is the coolest thing since Cocoa Pebbles (it’s like cereal, only chocolaty), then walk away from your keyboard, go get in your 1973 Ford Maverick, throw in your favorite Captain and Tenille 8-track, and …well… you get the picture.

I have just started using Diigo in the past few days, so I will have more to say about it later. However, I do think that this is one of the best social bookmarking sites that I have used. Long live Diigo!

July 16, 2006

Basic?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jason @ 7:23 am

You call this basic?

Blog at WordPress.com.