NeoArch

What’s past is prologue; what’s present is weblog

Preserving Wet Blogs

with 6 comments

For Baptists, especially Southern Baptists, it’s been a busy year. If you don’t believe me, one Baptist blogger has been keeping a log.

Ironically, it was about this time last year that I struck up a conversation with another Southern Baptist archivist about Baptist blogs while attending the ALABI meeting in Richmond. I mentioned that the whole idea of Baptist blogs and how to preserve them really troubled me, and I asked if his organization was doing anything in the way of preserving blogs. He confessed they were not, and he mentioned that he had not really thought much about it. I told him that our strategy was not the best, but that we had been trying to select, print, and file representative posts from a various important Baptist blogs. Admittedly, the selection criteria is highly subjective, and the original context of the item is destroyed, but at least something of the conversation is preserved.

At that time, I mentioned that several Baptist blogs were creating quite a stir within the denomination. One blogger in particular had criticized new policies that affected the appointment of international missionaries, and bloggers on all sides of the issues blogged, commented, and trackbacked their opinions for weeks on end. Seemingly, the whole denomination was at odds. Some bloggers accused denominational officials of nepotism and favoritism. Other bloggers clashed over theological and social issues, such as the use of alcohol by Christians and the relationship between baptism and church membership. Perhaps most importantly, the outcome of the impending SBC presidential election looked like it could be affected by bloggers. We parted that day, agreeing that we should talk about the problem later. We both got busy with our lives and jobs, and we have yet to finish the conversation.

Less than a month later, the SBC Annual Meeting was over, the dark horse presidential candidate that many of the bloggers endorsed came away with the victory, and newspapers such as the Washington Post and Raleigh’s News and Observer took notice. In less than a year, a group of loosely organized individuals helped shape the face of the largest Protestant denomination in the United States–and they used one of the most volatile mediums ever created to do it.

Here’s the rub; for many Baptists, blogs have replaced denominational newspapers as the default source for theological and denominational information and engagement. Those 19th century Baptist papers, however, seem to be much easier to preserve because of their fixed formats. Will 22nd century Baptists be able to read the “newspapers” of 21st century Baptists? Perhaps, but are we willing to chance it?

For the past year, I have maintained my current preservation strategy for such blogs, but I have continually been thinking and reading about the problem of archiving blogs. It’s the kind of thing that keeps me up at night, and that’s probably why I’m writing right now.

My present print-and-file strategy works…sort of. It does what Gerald Ham recommended in that it provides an accurate record of human experience–the experience of those humans called Baptists, but it does it at the high cost of losing the context. I can’t help but think that there has to be a better way to accurately preserve these “wet” blogs in an electronic format that does due diligence to their context before their content evaporates.

Over the next few posts, I want to explore my ideas on how best to ensure that the next generation of Baptists (or any other group for that matter) have the benefit of being able to read about the issues that are relevant to groups in our day. Some solutions have been offered for this problem, and I will try to assess as many of those as possible. And I promise, I plan to offer real suggestions for a way forward before this series is over. If there’s one thing that irritates me, it’s reading articles that amount to nothing more than glorified hand wringing. That’s the last thing that I want this series to be, and hopefully, before it’s finished, some suggestions, and possibly even some code, will emerge here.

Written by Jason Fowler

June 5, 2007 at 1:27 am

Posted in Preservation, blogs

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You will want to be aware a powerful conservative in Alabama just this weekend joined the blogosphere; and your blog here looks like a good vehicle to get the word out.
    John Killian of Maytown at http://www.johnkillian.blogspot.com

    Stephen Fox

    June 5, 2007 at 4:42 pm

  2. Great post – are you aware of the internet archive project? I wonder if some sort of backup of their data for certain cites would automate the process?

    Tony Kummer

    June 14, 2007 at 12:23 am

  3. [...] and information about issues pertaining to SBC life.  Jason Fowler, SBTS archivist, recently wrote on his blog the following [...]

  4. Tony,

    I am aware of the Internet Archive project, but at this point it’s really not well suited for blogs. Corporations and government agencies are currently using a product that the IA project offers to create web archives. That could be an answer. I think Kahle and company need to do a better job of making the wayback machine keyword searchable. If so, it may be an answer for preservation. I plan on talking about the difficulties of grabbing blog content in a future post.

    Currently, the only really influential Baptist blog that I’ve found in the Wayback Machine is Wade Burleson’s, and even that one isn’t sufficiently archived.

    Jason

    June 14, 2007 at 10:54 am

  5. Neat idea, Jason. But are we trying to preserve the comments too? It seems they contain all the statements that seem to stir up such enthusiasm.

    Adam Winters

    June 14, 2007 at 4:58 pm

  6. Adam,

    Ideally, yes. Comments do tend to reflect the accurate record of human experience to which Ham referred.

    This is another issue that I will try to develop more fully in a later post. For now I will just say that dealing with comments is the most difficult issue in the whole enterprise. Obviously the author of the blog wants discussion to occur or he or she would not allow comments. As an archivist, I think it is important to recognize and respect that fact. The creator of the record allows the comment to be there. This fact may cause me a headache, and I may ultimately decide that it’s not worthy of permanent retention, but if I do so, I feel like I must have a really good justification for making that decision.

    Also, comments are frequently added, so to collect them all, one has to be persistent about checking for additional ones for weeks, or possibly even years. Comments also bring in a litany of questions about copyright. Comments, if they have RSS feeds, are typically included in separate feeds from the original post. I could go on, but I’ll save further discussion for later.

    Great question, though.

    Jason

    June 14, 2007 at 5:30 pm


Leave a Reply