NeoArch

August 28, 2006

Certifiable.

Filed under: Archival Certification, Archives — Jason @ 9:53 am

Well, my wife always knew that I was certifiable, but now everyone else does as well. I am now a certified archivist. The envelope came from the ACA this past weekend, and I opened it with much trepidation. I cannot tell you how elated I was to complete this goal in my life. I studied for this exam for seven months. I am so thankful that the Lord gave me the perseverance to finish studying and the recall to pass the exam.

I intend to post later on how I would recommend studying for the exam. I will try to add links to several electronic sources that I found helpful.

Now that I am a C. A. (that’s the first time I have typed those letters! Boy, that felt good!) I would be glad to help any future candidates study for the exam. I did not realize until late in the study process that the ACA offers to pair certified archivists with candidates to help them prepare for the exam. If I had realized that sooner, I would have availed myself of the opportunity.

I am also willing to proctor the exam, if there is ever a group in Louisville, KY, that wants to take the exam. I am thankful to Mark Meade, archivist at Bellarmine University, for proctoring my exam, and if I can ever do the same for anyone else, I would like to.

Once again, thanks to Michele, Paul, Mr. Keisling, Taffey, Laura, and all my archives workers for encouraging me as I prepared for the exam.

August 17, 2006

Parting Shot

Filed under: Security, Uncategorized — Jason @ 9:52 am

While reading Frank Bole’s Selecting and Appraising Archives and Manuscripts recently, I found a funny quote. Unfortunately, I had the book on ILL and returned it yesterday, so I can’t quote it exactly. Boles was writing about archivists communicating with other institutions to ensure that different archives do not needlessly duplicate each other. He quoted someone who asked facetiously, “How many copies of the moon shot do we need anyway?”

Apparently, more than we now have.

Somehow, NASA lost the moon shot video.

August 2, 2006

Today Is the Day

Filed under: Archival Certification, Archives — Jason @ 8:01 am

It’s ACA certification exam day. I am full of fear and loathing. I probably should not be. I have been preparing for the test since way back in January. Those who know me well know that I usually do not operate in this fashion. I usually tend to be more of a crammer.

There is no way that I could have adequately “crammed” for this, though. I have not sat in on lectures. I have no notepack. This whole process has simply been me wrestling with the books, with God as my support, with Christ my Lord as the ultimate reason for taking the exam, and with the words of friends such as Taffey, Laura, Paul, Nathan, and Mr. Keisling as an encouragement. And Michele. Michele more than anyone has been the one to say, “You might want to think about cutting off ESPNU’s presentation of the NCAA Division II championship football game from LAST YEAR (!!!) and start studying again.” I wouldn’t be at this point without her.

I really don’t know what I am in for today. I have seen sample questions and the seven domains of the ACA’s Role Delineation, but I do not know exactly how reflective these are of the test. I am hopeful of positive results, but if I do not pass, I will sleep well knowing that I studied for this thing as hard as I could, given what I know about it. I will honestly be able to say that it was the best I could do at this point in my career. Hopefully, I won’t have to say that will a falling inflection.

July 26, 2006

Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts Book Review

Filed under: Archival Certification, Arrangement, Book Reviews, Description — Jason @ 8:00 am
  • Roe, Kathleen D . Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts, Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2005.

Kathleen Roe’s Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts is part of the Society of American Archivists’ Archival Fundamentals Series II. It replaces Frederic Miller’s book of the same title. Both are extremely valuable books, and in my opinion, they complement one another. Miller’s book reads more like a manual. It is very thorough, and I have reviewed it already. Roe’s contribution is an easier read and seems in many places to be carefully, thoughtfully worded. Take, for example, her description of the task of arrangement. “To accomplish [description], the archivist must first arrange records, that is, identify the intellectual pattern existing in the materials, then make sure their physical organization reflects that pattern” (7-8, emphasis mine). I wish someone had described it to me that way when I first began working in archives. That description is nearly perfect and exceptionally graceful. In short, Roe’s work reads more like an introduction to arrangement and description than Miller’s work.

The book begins with an overview of what archives and description (A&D) is and how it relates to other tasks the archivist undertakes like appraisal, preservation, and reference. It then has a chapter on the core concepts for A&D, a chapter that summarizes how A&D practices have developed over time, and a chapter on the practice of A&D The latter chapter makes up the bulk of the book. In the core concepts chapter, Roe does a good job of distinguishing archives from related institutions like libraries and museums. Likewise, she emphasizes strongly that description should begin at the highest level.

Chapter three is essentially a historical overview of A&D practice, especially in the U. S. and Canada. She briefly details the development of standards like MARC, APPM, EAD, DACS, RAD, and ISAD(G). The final chapter examines A&D practice. Although it does not read as manual-like as Miller’s work, Roe provides a solid foundation for thinking through the entire process of A&D, from accessioning to developing finding aids.

The one subject that I wish Roe would have treated more thoroughly is how to implement standardization within one’s collections. I suppose that thorough discussions of implementing EAD and DACS are more appropriate for extended works rather than introductions, but I was hoping for more from this book in that area.

While reading this work, I often found myself thinking, “she just answered a question I have been thinking about for some time.” This entire work contains excellent and well-placed insets with pertinent examples to the subject being discussed. Additionally, Roe offers several appendices that give extended examples and case studies. The case studies prove especially helpful in providing practical advice for dealing with rather difficult arrangement decisions. All in all, I would recommend this book highly, especially to novice archivists.

July 25, 2006

Catharsis

Filed under: Archival Certification, Archives, Uncategorized — Jason @ 7:48 pm

One week from tomorrow I will be taking the ACA exam. I am extremely nervous. I can honestly say that I have studied for this test harder than any other that I have ever taken. They only offer it once a year so I decided to forgo a mission trip with my church to St. Thomas in order to try to take the test. I really wanted to go, but I feel like I have to take the test.

I am fearful right now. I really would like to pass the exam, but I realize that I am essentially a self-trained archivist. I have been to some workshops on archives, and I worked under an archivist who was trained primarily as a historian, but I have no formal training in the field. I have a good bit of on the job training. I have read widely about the field, and I continue to do so, but I am not certain that this will be enough.

I realize that there are constant discussions concerning professionalism and the value of certification in the field. Certification, in my mind, does not necessarily qualify me to be an archivist. The process of preparing for this exam has indeed helped better equip me in the field, but that does not mean that it qualifies me. Likewise, I do not believe that being certified would make me a better archivist. To pass the test would be a point of pride for me. It is a goal for which I have worked very hard. It would say that I at least have attained a fairly decent working knowledge of the field. It would tangibly signify that I understand many of the things that my employer expects me to understand.

Why am I writing this? Perhaps because this blog came about through my desire to prepare for the exam. So, perhaps it’s appropriate that my fear and loathing be expressed here, right beside my book reviews, study notes, and thoughts on archivy.

June 28, 2006

Odd Jobs

Filed under: Archives, Systems, Uncategorized — Jason @ 12:24 pm

As I said in my first post on this blog, I work both as a systems librarian and an archivist. The combination sometimes makes for strange weeks, but both duties are enjoyable and rewarding in different ways. This seems particularly evident to me as I reflect on the last week of work.

Last week, I had one of the most enjoyable days of my fledgling career. In one day, I helped a patron identify exactly which 1589 Geneva Bible he had inherited; I worked with another exceptionally rare Bible; I held the first book that ever entered our library; I helped one of our patrons find a much needed resource that he had been unable to find; and I aided a researcher in using a set of Baptist associational minutes which turned out to have a heretofore unreferenced circular letter by the second president of the Southern Baptist Convention. That was a great day!

Yesterday, I had a different kind of day. I sent another librarian several HTML files that would enable her to do something her library director wanted on their website. I changed out a SCSI card. I replaced the computer that was wired to our microfilm scanner. I installed the software that went along with said scanner. I worked with another systems librarian to help identify why our MetaLib and SFX server wasn’t working. I made a really, really long Ethernet cable.

It’s odd. Four years ago I would not have seen myself doing either of these things for a career. Now, I work in two disparate fields in the same job, and I seem to enjoy both in different ways for different reasons. As an archivist, I work one on one with people, pointing them to the resources they need. It’s very rewarding in tangible ways. Patrons generally love you if you are an archivist. I even occasionally get thanked in the front-matter of books.

As a systems librarian, I get the feeling of accomplishment as I make things work using my own ingenuity. No one ever taught me how to change a SCSI card. No one told me how to install software. And probably, no patron is ever going to thank me for what I do with systems (aside from other staff.) And that’s ok. I don’t do my job for thanks. Thanks is nice, but I do what I do for three reasons.

First, God has placed me where I am to do what I do for his glory. When I point researchers to the right resources, God is glorified. When I change a SCSI card so researchers can use microfilm, God is glorified. Second, I do what I do because I like doing it. I enjoy meeting the needs of researchers. I enjoy working with computers and computer systems. Third, I do what I do because I get paid. What can I say? I like to eat!

Despite the fact that these duties are disparate, they do share one commonality. Without someone doing them, no one would get to the resources they need. When our system is running, patrons can find what they need. When I create finding aids, I help patrons find what they need. And maybe that’s the tie that binds the odd jobs I enjoy.

June 2, 2006

Back from ALABI

Filed under: ALABI, Archives, Church, Uncategorized — Jason @ 12:12 pm

Well, my sidekick Andrew and I have returned from the ALABI annual meeting in Richmond, Virginia. With apologies to Travis Tritt, not only is it "a long way to Richmond driving north on 95," it's also a long way to Richmond driving east on 64. Still, the trip was great and I think we both had a really good time listening to the presentations and cavorting with fellow librarians and archivists.

The conference took place at the IMB building in Richmond. I was surprised at how many of the participants had never been to the building (Andrew and I were among that number) although many who had not been learned the address when they were going through RAs and GAs. I don't think I ever learned the address, but I still remember the RA pledge.

We were extremely impressed with the IMB facilities, especially the library, archives, and records management areas we saw. The IMB has a first class facility for taking care of the various types of records, and Southern Baptists should be happy that some of their CP giving goes toward preserving the history of SBC missions work. We were also amazed at how diminutive Lottie Moon was. Here is a picture of 6 feet tall Andrew beside a life size picture of Lottie.Lottie

Getting to see old friends and meet new ones is always an advantage of going to conferences. I got to spend time with all of the SBHLA gang (Bill, Taffey, and Kathy) as well as my former archives colleague Nathan Finn. I also had a chance to hang out with DebbiLee Landi, the archivist for Furman University. If you are ever working on a writing project about South Carolina Baptists, you simply must go work with the Baptist Historical Collection at Furman. DebbiLee and her staff are always gracious, and their new facilities are, well, off the hizzie. The decor in their research room really makes you want to pursue research, after you marvel at the decor for about ten minutes–lots of wood, muted tones, and high ceilings.

I also had the opportunity to meet some new faces. On Wednesday morning, I had breakfast with Bill Sumners, and he introduced me to Alan Lefever and Naomi Taplin, both of whom made me laugh and offered helpful advice about pursuing an MLIS degree. I met Laura Botts of Mercer University, who was one of the younger archivists at the conference. We had a brief opportunity to talk about wikis, blogs, and how archivists need to begin embracing the whole 2.0 meme. I met several other archivists who had been around the ALABI/SBLA circuit for a number of years, and I was encouraged to see people who had happily cared for Baptist collections for a number of years. Some were working with Baptist materials before I was born! They were very open and cordial to the "new blood" that has come into the association, and they were even kind enough to listen to my rambling attempt at a presentation, despite the fact that I am an ignorant newbie. I appreciate their graciousness and look forward to working with this group for years to come!

I will post more later about the presentations. 

May 31, 2006

Baptist Research and Statistics

Filed under: ALABI, Church, Preservation, Systems, Uncategorized — Jason @ 8:58 am

On Wednesday, May 31, I will be speaking at the ALABI meeting in Richmond, Virginia. I am involved in a section on Baptist Research and Statistics. Basically, I will be looking at the way researchers at my institution use Baptist statistics, and proposing a way that I think librarians, Lifeway, and the entire Southern Baptist Convention could work together to better preserve and make accessible our data. My proposal is just an idea that I had, and should in no way be construed as anything more than this. I would love for the convention to consider it, but it could be nothing more than one archivist's pipe dream. I will try to post a series that will better explain all this later, along with what I see as the advantages and disadvantages of my proposal.

As a service to those attending, I include the text that will appear in my Power Point presentation below. For the record, the section on connectors, mavens, and salesmen is taken from Malcom Gladwell's book, The Tipping Point.

  • How researchers at SBTS use statistics
    • To answer cultural questions
    • To corroborate findings
    • To analyze worldview patterns
    • To analyze church health
    • For background information on a potential employer
  • Statistical resources researchers use
    • Diaries, journals, serendipitous reading
    • Reports from Joshua Project and IMB
    • World Christian Database and CIA World Fact Book
    • Baptist newspapers
    • Baptist Minutes
    • Southern Baptist Directory Service
    • Baptist Quarterly Review
  • What SBTS Researchers Want
    • The nearly impossible
    • Ease of access to Baptist statistics
    • Ease of access to non-Baptist statistics
    • Standardized data
  • Difficulties for creating access
    • Acquisition Issues
      • Collecting minutes takes time and space
      • Who is responsible?
    • Preservation Issues
      • CD-ROMs
      • Proprietary formats
  • An Answer
    • A web based solution for Baptist minutes
      • Multi-platform
      • Open Source
      • LAMP
      • Exports to multiple formats (XML, HTML, PDF, .txt, .doc)
    • Able to handle all types of minutes
      • All levels (Convention, State, Associational, Church)
      • All time periods (retrospective and prospective)
      • All data (statistics, reports, circular letters, queries, list of ministers)
    • A Convention wide effort
      • Promoted and underwritten by Lifeway
        • In conjunction with the research initiative
        • Lightning press printing of minutes
      • Able to be contributed to by people at every level
        • Spreads labor
        • Many eyes looking at it
  • What can we do
    • Volunteer to help work on an answer
    • Talk to others about preservation and access problems
      • Connectors– unique people who connect us to everyone else
      • Mavens– those who accumulate knowledge
      • Salesmen– persuade people to accept new information

      Urge better statistic gathering practices

    • Make relationships with archivists from other denominations

May 16, 2006

The Difference between Archives and Manuscripts

Filed under: Description, Uncategorized — Jason @ 7:08 pm

Because I am a librarian, I believe that those who search should find. Someone was led to this site today after having used the search string "difference between archives and manuscripts."

I don't know who the searcher was, but if he or she feels kinda like Bono did back in 1987, (i.e. I still haven't found what I'm looking for,) then I have some good news.

Here are the glossary definitions that the Society of American Archivists provides for archives and manuscript. The differences there should be fairly obvious.

A Glossary for Archivists, Manuscript Curators, and Records Managers (The Society of American Archivists, 1992), edited by Lewis J. Bellardo and Lynn Lady Bellardo, defines archives as "The non-current records of an organization or institution preserved because of their continuing value." It also defines manuscript as "A handwritten or typed document."

The University of Maryland also describes the differences between archives and manuscripts in this FAQ.

Personally, I think that the difference between the two lies in who created the documents and why they were created. If documents were created by an organization, institution, business, agency, or individual for legal obligations or business transactions, they are archives. If they were created or collected by individuals or families for reasons other than these, they are manuscripts.

There is some ambiguity inherent in the way I view the distinction. For example, personal papers (i.e. a type of manuscript collection) often contain information about business transations such as land purchases, stocks, and investments. But these series within the overall collection are generally small portions of the overall collection and do not represent the character of the whole. Still, I think that evaluating the character and function of records generally yields a pretty clear distinction between these two types of collections.

A Modern Archives Reader Book Review

Filed under: Archives, Book Reviews, Uncategorized — Jason @ 8:00 am
  • Daniels, Maygene and Timothy Walch, editors. A Modern Archives Reader, Washington: National Archives and Records Administration, 1984.

A Modern Archives Reader is an archival science reader that was developed by the National Archives and Records Administration. It includes readings on archival history, records administration, appraisal, acquisition, arrangement, description, reference, public programs, and archival management. The work is now over twenty years old, but many of the articles are valuable, especially the articles written by Posner, Schellenberg, Ham, and Jenkinson. The chapter on arrangement includes two essays. In the first, Ernst Posner outlines developments that have happened in archives since the French Revolution. Posner notes that the French Revolution provided a centralized national archives, put the state in charge of records, and provided for the accessibility of records. Then he traces the development of archives administration, legislation, and the concept of respect des fonds. The second article on history provides Sir Hilary Jenkinson's reflections on being an archivist. Jenkinson stresses that archives come together naturally, are used for unintended reasons, have an important custodial history, and have the potential for helping anyone in the world.

The chapter on appraisal contains an article on appraisal by Schellenberg. In this article, he sets forth the several distinctions between primary and secondary values, and informational and evidential values. Schellenberg sees these distinctions as important to understanding archives. He supplies tests to apply for evidential and informational values. Leonard Rapport also offers an article that in some respects is a reassessment of Schellenberg's ideas. He argues that some accessions should be re-accessioned, and that sometimes this should occur to reduce bulk and to dispose of records that are not worthy of being kept. The acquisitions chapters offer advice on developing a collecting policy, developing collections, performing field work, and deed of gifts.

The chapter on arrangement offers articles by Schellenberg and Oliver Wendell Holmes on the levels of arrangement. While both chapters are detailed, Holmes offers instruction on even boxing, shelving, and labeling files. A chapter on organizing photographic collections also recommends that photographic collections be treated as collections, rather than individual items. It notes that there are (at least at the time the article was written) no standards for cataloging photographic collections. There are also sections dealing with finding aids, inventories, registries, and subject guides.

In the chapter of reference, Mary Jo Pugh contends for indexes within archives in order to provide adequate access points to collections that have a provenance based arrangement. Finally, Gerald Ham treats the processes at work in archival selection in an article entitled, The Archival Edge. He notes that many have criticized archivists for having a slipshod methodology when it comes to selection. Ham himself enquires why archivists document the experience of humanity so poorly. He offers five developments that force archivists to be more active: institutionalization, bulk, missing data, vulnerable records, and technology. For archivists to adjust to these changes and select materials well, Ham suggests that they must change their habits, be committed to developing national guidelines, allocate resources better to collect missing data, and actively engage in documenting culture.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.